Ferguson, MO, August 15, 2014 (AcuteMania.net) – It never fails. Every time that a black “youth” is killed by a white person, a riot erupts and politicians come out to exploit the situation. The case of Michael Brown is only too typical.

Not surprisingly, the guy turns out to be a violent crook (Click the image or the video below to see him in action). Most of us with any sense already guessed as much. However, this time the race baiters managed to get some high-profile libertarians on board.

Rand Paul probably destroyed what was left of his presidential potential when he wrote an op-ed for Time that began thus:

The shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown is an awful tragedy that continues to send shockwaves through the community of Ferguson, Missouri and across the nation.

If I had been told to get out of the street as a teenager, there would have been a distinct possibility that I might have smarted off. But, I wouldn’t have expected to be shot.

Would you have also assaulted people and robbed a store beforehand, Rand?

Rand Paul wasn’t the only one. Erick Erickson at Red State penned this sentimental drivel on his website:

The police officer claims Mr. Brown tried to take the police officer’s gun. Witnesses disagree. What is undisputed is by the time you read this Mr. Brown, who worked his way through a bleak high school education in Ferguson, MO, would be in a college classroom. He defied the odds of many young black men, graduated from high school, and would have started college last week had he been alive. But he failed to beat the odds of young black men having bad encounters with police.

Was he going to college before or after his prison term, Erick?

These obscene stories about the innocence of black thugs who get killed is typical of leftist political operatives. Now that Rand and Erick have been shown to be ignorant and wrong, they owe the police and the people who backed them a huge apology.

Rand Paul, you can forget 2016. You are done.

Now the left-wing Washington Post is running this story about how one of the women who accused Herman Cain of some non-sexual, but offensive nonetheless, “gesture” wants to come forward and tell her side of the story. Of course, she’s bound by her non-disclosure agreement. How convenient?

This the perfect liberal lynching technique. They get to accuse Herman Cain of unspecified acts of sexual harassment from an unseen accuser who supposedly desperately wants to tell her side of the story. Yes, this poor woman would like to get the truth out, but she sold herself to the National Restaurant Association like a common street trollop instead. Now, she’s forbidden to speak.

If only the National Restaurant Association would release these women from their confidentiality agreements and allow them to speak, then we could learn the truth, the story goes. Of course, the National Restaurant Association only settled with these women to avoid bad press. So, the liberal media knows that no release is going to happen.

However, Herman Cain found an ally today in Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul, who was previously the subject of a leftist media smear campaign himself:

In my election, I had an anonymous girl from college — who I still don’t know — make accusations against me. I don’t think you should print stuff like that. To libel someone’s character and not put your name on it, I think is inappropriate and shouldn’t be printed.