AcuteMania

For Truth, Honor, and Freedom
Try Acutemania's Conservative News Search

Gay Pride Parades, Perversions, and Killing Gays with Kindness

If you look at the gay “community” for any length of time, you can’t help but come to the conclusion that homosexuality is an unnatural and dangerous perversion. As gay groups and sympathizers, who want to push for gay marriage, try to put forward this wholesome image of homosexual couples who are just like everyone else, it is impossible to escape the reality that they are not.

Gay pride parades organizers claim to be seeking to make the world safe for gay people to live. They aren’t. They are looking for a platform to expand their legions of perversion. They want recruits, and young ones too.

You don’t believe it? Do you think gay pride parades are about pride? Ask yourself why the gay pride parades are so much different than others.

We have Veteran’s Day and Labor Day parades for veterans and labor groups; neither of which features guys writhing in their underwear or simulating group sex acts. We would not allow them on our streets if they did. In contrast, almost every gay pride parade features perversions of those types or worse.

Why can’t homosexuals have a parade without turning it into an orgy? The only sensible conclusion is that gay people are, by and large, mentally ill. Psychology groups have been pressured into reclassifying homosexuality as normal, but it isn’t.

Homosexuals make up 2-3% of the population but a large and disproportionate amount of bondage, casual sex, porn, sadomasochism, and drug use. For example, the rate of meth use among gay men has been reported to be 20 times the rate of the general population:

Roughly one of every 10 men who have sex with men reported using meth within a six-month period, according to a 2005 study cited by the L.A. County Department of Public Health in a report this week. That frequency is about 20 times greater than in the general population, Fielding said.

Programs exist to help get gay men get off drugs and prevent HIV, but they are mostly unsuccessful because they don’t address the underlying deviancy: Homosexuality. AIDS grew among gay men precisely because their behavior; getting together in bathhouses with a bunch of strange men to exchange bodily fluids is a prescription for disaster:

At the club, there were plenty of condoms for the taking, courtesy of the management, but in conversations with a dozen patrons who acknowledged using crystal, only two men said they were following the rules of engagement in the age of AIDS. ”Some guys just throw you out of the room if you pull one out,” said one of the men, James, who, like everyone else, would not give his full name. ”To them, rubbers are a killjoy.”

Homosexuality is the disease that must be cured. Tolerance has become the misguided prescription for every ill. Homosexuality is like obesity. We talk about the acceptance of fat people and say that big is beautiful as they eat themselves into an early grave. Homosexuality is no different; it kills. Tolerance has become the cruelty that kills with kindness.

We create lies and say that obesity and homosexuality are genetic and that there is nothing we can do to cure them. It’s a lie. Behavior is always changeable. Fat people can eat less and work out more. Gay men can stop going to bathhouses. The answers are easy, even if the actions are difficult.

However, there are those who don’t want to see an end to homosexual degeneracy. They claim that people who don’t accept homosexuality as normal are intolerant and mean. It is the exact opposite.

When we see a gay person, we see a person in trouble who is in need of rescue. Is it kindness to encourage behavior which you know will likely lead to drug use, promiscuity, and an early grave? Or is it kinder to tell homosexuals to change their behavior and save themselves?

The truth is that if you really hated gay people, you would encourage them to continue doing what they are doing.

, , , , , , , , , , , ,
June 23, 2013 at 10:34 pm Comments (9)

Democrat Senator Al Franken “Glad” About Homosexual Killing

It is a tolerant remark from Minnesota’s liberal democrat Senator: Al Franken. The statements in the image above came from an interview in The Harvard Crimson which is posted here. His full statement reads as follows

It’s not preppies, cause I’m a preppie myself. I just don’t like homosexuals. If you ask me, they’re all homosexuals in the Pudding. Hey, I was glad when that Pudding homosexual got killed in Philadelphia.

, , , , , , , ,
April 1, 2013 at 11:15 am Comment (1)

Elmo Exits Sesame Street Amid 2nd Gay Pedophilia Charge, Lawsuit, and Failed $125,000 Payoff

Just when you thought Sesame Street was safe again, you find out that Elmo’s insatiable hunger for the flesh of little boys will not be quenched as a fresh homosexual, pedophilia charge emerges.

This time, the accuser has come out openly making charges directly at Elmo puppeteer, Kevin Clash. The new accuser is Cecil Singleton and he claims that Kevin Clash molested him when he was 15 years old. Specifically, TMZ reports that

According to Singleton, his sexual relationship with Clash began when he was 15 and Clash was an adult … and initially lasted for 2 weeks. But they picked things up a while later.

Singleton claims that while they never had sexual intercourse, the two did engage in several sexual activities together … including “groping, masturbation, intense kissing, dry-humping.”

Singleton says they had sexual intercourse years later … when Cecil was an adult.

Furthermore, E! is also reporting that Singleton is suing Clash for more than 5 million dollars in damages: psychological and emotional. A very detailed report of Cecil’s charge and accusation is here.

As we reported before, the first accuser was Sheldon Stephens, who claims to have signed a deal to keep quiet for a mere $125,000. It seems Stephens now claims that he signed the agreement under duress and no longer wants to honor it.

As all of this has emerged, it looks like the Sesame Workshop has decided that Kevin Clash has molested enough children on Sesame Street and has thrown him overboard. As reported in The Telegraph, PBS should be recognized for writing the kindest firing speech for a pedophile ever:

In a statement on Tuesday, Sesame Workshop, the non-profit organisation behind the show, said: Kevin Clash has helped us achieve that mission for 28 years, and none of us, especially Kevin, want anything to divert our attention from our focus on serving as a leading educational organisation.

Unfortunately, the controversy surrounding Kevin’s personal life has become a distraction that none of us want, and he has concluded that he can no longer be effective in his job and has resigned from Sesame Street. This is a sad day for Sesame Street.

With all of this, you would think that Sesame Street would have had enough of Elmo, but that does not seem to be the case. As E! reports, Sesame Street plans to continue the muppet’s career on the show.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
November 21, 2012 at 12:22 am Comments (2)

“Elmo” Pays Accuser to Keep Gay Pedophilia Charges Quiet

It appears that the identity of the man who accused Elmo puppeteer, Kevin Clash, of pedophilia is no longer a secret. According to TMZ, he is Sheldon Stephens, and he was paid $125,000 to drop his charges and keep quiet.

In the past few days, stories have run that reported that Sheldon Stephens had recanted the charges against Kevin Clash (AKA “Elmo”). That appears not to be the case. As TMZ is reports,

We’ve learned although Stephens signed the document, he continues to insist Clash had sex with him when he was a minor and was pressured into signing the settlement.

One source privy to the negotiations tells TMZ … Stephens was crying during final negotiations and repeatedly insisted he didn’t want to sign.

We contacted Clash’s lawyer, but he had no comment.

In recent days, the press has been full of articles designed to destroy the reputation of accuser, Sheldon Stephens. Everywhere you look, they are running stories to discredit him in order to save “Elmo.” It is a disgusting silence and destroy mission.

, , , , , , , , , ,
November 17, 2012 at 7:04 pm Comments (0)

Gay Elmo Puppeteer Accused of Pedophilia, Confirmed as Internet Pervert

It gives a whole new meaning to the saying, “Tickle me, Elmo.” In a bizarre tale that has several unsavory turns, the man behind (no pun intended) the muppet Elmo was accused of carrying on a homosexual liaison with an underaged boy.

Specifically, the homosexual former lover of the Elmo muppeteer, Kevin Clash 52, asserted that Clash had sex with him when the accuser was only 16. According to Clash their relationship did not start until the accuser was at least 18; he is now 23.

Eventually, the accuser dropped his charges and the question remains: why? The initial charges were brought against Kevin Clash in June. The account of the June accusation, as recorded in the Toronto Star, runs as follows:

“We took the allegation very seriously and took immediate action,” Sesame Workshop said in a statement issued Monday. “We met with the accuser twice and had repeated communications with him. We met with Kevin, who denied the accusation.”

The organization described the relationship as “unrelated to the workplace.” Its investigation found the allegation of underage conduct to be unsubstantiated. But it said Clash exercised “poor judgment” and was disciplined for violating company policy regarding Internet usage. It offered no details.

In other words, the incident was swept under the rug, despite the fact that Kevin Clash was found to be doing something inappropriate on the internet. It is not surprising that PBS was quick to ditch this issue; a perverted muppet is a terrible marketing tool for children.

The question is why did the accuser bring this issue up in November after it was dismissed in June only to dismiss it again? Was he paid to go away and never be heard from again? It would not be surprising since PBS would hate the publicity, and PBS and Kevin Clash are not talking now.

That begs the question: Is there still a pedophile on Sesame Street? Whether or not the accuser was over 18 at the time is only legally relevant. The fact is that it takes a sick 50 year old man to take sexual advantage of an 18 year old boy. That is not the sort of person that I would want anywhere near a children’s television program.

, , , , , , , , , ,
November 16, 2012 at 10:36 pm Comments (3)

« Older PostsNewer Posts »